It’s all the rage on the Left right now: more jobs have been created during President Obama’s tenure than George Bush’s. Praise be to government, they did it!
Except, no they didn’t. Quite the opposite actually.
CNN Wire reported that 11.3 million jobs were created during Barack Obama’s tenure as President, and that the economy has been growing for 75 straight months; a new record of continued growth.
However, it is important to delve deeper into these numbers to get a fuller understanding of what they truly mean. When the numbers are viewed in light of other important economic indicators, and not in a vacuum, one can clearly see that this is not as strong an economy as the Left wants you to believe.
So why is 11.3 million new jobs not a sign of economic recovery? Because the kind of jobs that were created are largely part time, or are in industries not designed for career-style work (fast food, retail, restaurant, etc.). While these jobs are increasing in number, it does not mean that the economy is stronger.
In fact, the indication may be the exact opposite.
Consider it this way: let’s say an industrial company lays off 10 full-time salaried employees at the plant because of the regulatory war waged by the federal government. Over a period of several months, those 10 people get jobs elsewhere, in addition to 10 others who were already looking for work.
Now, it is important to consider the quality of the jobs that these people enter. In a strong economy, each of these people could find similar positions at other companies. But here, in this hypothetical example, they have to take jobs for which they are severely over-qualified: retail workers, fast-food workers, etc.
Could one, in an intellectually honest way, say that the economy is doing well because 20 people found work? No, because the quality of the jobs does not contribute to a higher per capita income. The overall number of jobs is greater, but the fact that these jobs are transitory and less-paying undermines the notion that this is a good economic situation.
This is exactly what is happening with the numbers in the Obama economy, and the December jobs report is a perfect example of that.
…according to the BLS at least, some 155,000 seasonally adjusted jobs were added in December, arbitrarily goalseeked as they may have been. Where were they? Here is the answer:
The most actively hiring sector was health care, which saw a whopping 70,000 increase in December jobs, nearly half of total. Most of the increase occured in ambulatory health care services (+30,000) and hospitals (+11,000). Social assistance added 20,000 jobs in December, reflecting job growth in individual and family services (+21,000).
Professional and Busines Services rose by a total of 30,500, the second highest gaining category. here the biggest contributor was Administrative and Waste Services to Buildings and Dwellings, which rose by 10,600.
Another minimum wage job category that added jobs in December was Leisure and Hospitality, which added a grand total of 24,000 jobs. here, the biggest contributor was an old favorite: employment in food services and drinking places, which continued to trend up in December (+30,000).
What is curious is that while retailers have been laying off thousands of people left and right, according to the BLS this category added another 6,300 in December, if a substantial drop from November’s 19,500.
Highly paid construction jobs declined by 3,000 in December after posting a substantial rebound of 17,000 in November
Just as troubling was the ongoing decline in Information jobs, which declined by 6,000 in December, after dropping double that amount in November
Also concerning was the sharp drop in Temp Help services: a harbinger of pent up labor demand, this category tumbled by 15,500 in December, the biggest monthly decline in years.
There was some good news for higher paying wages in December: Employment edged up in manufacturing (+17,000), with a gain of 15,000 in the durable goods component.
Employment in the highly paid financial activities also continued on an upward trend in December (+13,000).
Finally, government added an additional 12,000 jobs.
Additionally, one also has to consider the labor force participation rate, a much broader look at the overall employment market than the unemployment rate.
According to CNS News, the labor force participation rate greatly decreased during the Obama years. The number of Americans no longer in the labor market now stands at a staggering 95,102,000, an 18% since his inauguration.
In December, according to the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, a record 95,102,000 Americans were not in the labor force, 47,000 more than in November; and the labor force participation rate was 62.7 percent, a tenth of a point higher than in November.
The participation rate dropped to a 38-year low of 62.4 percent on Obama’s watch, in September 2015. It was only 3-tenths of a point higher than that last month.
One of the important things to note is that those who have stopped looking for work do not fall under the “unemployed” category; therefore, when the unemployment rate is displayed as a measure of economic health, it’s really a farce. The actual number of people who do not have gainful employment is far greater than the unemployment rate actually suggests.
Confusing? Yes. Truthful? No.
So next time you hear someone say that unemployment is low, and that shows a strong economy, remind them of this.