Federal Judge Issues Horrific Ruling in Benghazi Case

A Federal judge has issued what we think is a horrific ruling in a Benghazi related case.

The judge ruled that important evidence in the trial of Libyan radical Islamist Ahmed Abu Khattala, charged with organizing the September 11, 2012 assault on Benghazi, must be withheld from the jury:

Days before the 5th year anniversary of the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya that killed U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens, a federal judge ruled that jurors at the trial of Libyan radical Islamist Ahmed Abu Khattala, charged with organizing the September 11, 2012 assault, cannot be told information that may prove he threatened to murder one of Stevens’s successor, Politico reported.

Khattala’s trial is expected to happen later this month in Washington, D.C. U.S. District Court Judge Christopher Cooper prevented prosecutors from showing evidence to jurors that proves Khattala communicated to an ally about murdering the other U.S. ambassador in retaliation for the U.S.’s capture of another Libyan Islamist in 2012, Abu Anas Al-Libi. …

Judge Cooper also prohibited prosecutors from showing evidence that Khattala ordered associates to assassinate an American teacher in Libya.

Khattala faces life in prison if convicted, however, Attorney General Loretta Lynch declared in 2016 that prosecutors would not seek the death penalty against Khattala.

This seems to be a travesty and a miscarriage of justice.

What do you think about this? Sound off in the comment section below.