The left has found a new member of their “resistance.”
They’ve got Hillary Clinton and Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.
Chuck Schumer too … And Elizabeth Warren.
But they’re old. Old and white.
Sure, there are some celebrities – like Cher and Rosie. But they’re crazy.
Ahh! Crazy! That’s what we need.
But maybe not so white … and not so old.
So who to get … who can they find whose both crazy and not white.
Does Asian count? How about Korean? Because North Korea’s got a whole lot of crazy wrapped up in one pudgy, little package.
So here comes Kim Jong Un. His ability to lob insults is on par with President Trump and he’s a whole lot of crazy too. And – he’s now a part of the new leftist “resistance!”
Of course, Kim is a murderous tyrant and a dictator. But that doesn’t matter. Hell, he called Trump a “dotard,” and that sent the media into a frenzy.
So Kim Jong-Un: Welcome to the resistance.
— Limmy (@DaftLimmy) September 22, 2017
You’re among good company. Well, no, you’re not.
Kim Jong Un is right: “Far from making remarks that can be viewed as helpful to defusing tension, [Trump] made unprecedented rude nonsense.”
— Touré (@Toure) September 22, 2017
Well, then … if you’re agreeing with Touré, you’re in good company, right? Right?
Is anyone else as fearful as I am that Jong-un's #dotard comment may push Trump towards nuclear war.
He is a thin-skinned dotard.
— Impeach Donald Trump (@Impeach_D_Trump) September 22, 2017
As so-called “news satirist” Steve Redmond said: “You know things are bad when you agree with a crazy North Korean dictator. Maybe in Trump’s case instead of #dotard it should be #doughtard.”
— Steve Redmond (@sjredmond) September 22, 2017
What witty satire!
Kim Jong Un calling Trump a #dotard means he's used an English dictionary at least one more time than Trump.
— Nick Jack Pappas (@Pappiness) September 21, 2017
The site “Funny or Die” got in on the act.
do·tard (dōdərd) noun
A word you didn't previously know existed, but googled today and said, "Damn, that's pretty accurate."
— Funny Or Die (@funnyordie) September 22, 2017
Even the New York Times decided that they wanted to call Kim’s comments a “burn.”
Kim Jong-un called Trump a "dotard." How harsh is that burn?https://t.co/3doikPTrQR
— The New York Times (@nytimes) September 22, 2017
“How harsh is that burn,” they asked.
How completely idiotic. Well, if the left wants a murderous dictator as part of their resistance, they can have him.
FYI: The North Korean propaganda machine is good with these bizarre statements that seem like a cross between Shakespeare on acid and the monologue in a bad Tim Burton movie. Here’s Kim’s “statement:”
The speech made by the U.S. president in his maiden address on the U.N. arena in the prevailing serious circumstances, in which the situation on the Korean Peninsula has been rendered tense as never before and is inching closer to a touch-and-go state, is arousing worldwide concern.
Shaping the general idea of what he would say, I expected he would make stereotyped, prepared remarks a little different from what he used to utter in his office on the spur of the moment as he had to speak on the world’s biggest official diplomatic stage.
But, far from making remarks of any persuasive power that can be viewed to be helpful to defusing tension, he made unprecedented rude nonsense one has never heard from any of his predecessors.
A frightened dog barks louder.
I’d like to advise Trump to exercise prudence in selecting words and to be considerate of whom he speaks to when making a speech in front of the world.
The mentally deranged behavior of the U.S. president openly expressing on the U.N. arena the unethical will to “totally destroy” a sovereign state, beyond the boundary of threats of regime change or overturn of social system, makes even those with normal thinking faculty think about discretion and composure.
His remarks remind me of such words as “political layman” and “political heretic” which were in vogue in reference to Trump during his presidential election campaign.
After taking office Trump has rendered the world restless through threats and blackmail against all countries in the world. He is unfit to hold the prerogative of supreme command of a country, and he is surely a rogue and a gangster fond of playing with fire, rather than a politician.
His remarks which described the U.S. option through straightforward expression of his will have convinced me, rather than frightening or stopping me, that the path I chose is correct and that it is the one I have to follow to the last.
Now that Trump has denied the existence of and insulted me and my country in front of the eyes of the world and made the most ferocious declaration of a war in history that he would destroy the D.P.R.K. [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea], we will consider with seriousness exercising of a corresponding, highest level of hard-line countermeasure in history.
Action is the best option in treating the dotard who, hard of hearing, is uttering only what he wants to say.
As a man representing the D.P.R.K. and on behalf of the dignity and honor of my state and people and on my own, I will make the man holding the prerogative of the supreme command in the U.S. pay dearly for his speech calling for totally destroying the D.P.R.K.
This is not a rhetorical expression loved by Trump.
I am now thinking hard about what response he could have expected when he allowed such eccentric words to trip off his tongue.
Whatever Trump might have expected, he will face results beyond his expectation.
I will surely and definitely tame the mentally deranged U.S. dotard with fire.