Top Clinton Aides Who Lied To The FBI Got Special Treatment

The corrupt, double standard in how the FBI treats Democrats accused of crimes versus how they treat Republicans is now exposed for what it is.

The FBI agent who was fired from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation team for sending anti-Donald Trump text messages conducted the interviews with two Hillary Clinton aides accused of giving false statements about what they knew of the former secretary of state’s private email server.

Neither of the Clinton associates, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, faced legal consequences for their misleading statements, which they made in interviews last year with former FBI section chief Peter Strzok.

But another Strzok interview subject was not so lucky.

Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser, pleaded guilty last week to lying during an interview he gave on Jan. 24 to Strzok and another FBI agent. Circa journalist Sara Carter reported on Monday that Strzok took part in that interview with the retired lieutenant general.

At the time, Strzok was the FBI’s top investigator on the fledgling investigation into Russian interference in the presidential campaign. He was appointed to supervise that effort at the end of July 2016, just weeks after the conclusion of the Clinton email probe. CNN reported on Monday that as the FBI’s No. 2 counterintelligence official, Strzok signed the documents that officially opened the collusion inquiry.

The starkly different outcomes from Strzok’s interviews — a felony charge against Flynn and a free pass to Mills and Abedin — are sure to raise questions from Republicans about double-standards in the FBI’s two most prominent political investigations.

This is all part of the pattern of a corrupt, politicized FBI:

As Republicans and Democrats alike are trying to get to the bottom of the ongoing Russia controversy, new information has emerged concerning the former President Bill Clinton, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and what they covered up.

According to Fox News:

In Washington, the ostensible story is rarely the real story. We know, for example, that former President Clinton engineered a meeting with President Obama’s attorney general, Loretta Lynch, on the tarmac of the Phoenix Airport on June 27, 2016.

That’s the official story, replete with the charming and intentionally disarming detail that all they talked about was their grandchildren. It was just coincidental, don’t you know, that at the time the FBI was looking into Hillary Clinton’s use of a “personal” email server to send, receive and store classified information.

And it was also simply coincidental that just a few days later, the director of the FBI – who served under Attorney General Lynch – announced that he wouldn’t recommend a prosecution of Hillary Clinton.

Yes, that was the original story.

And, if you believe that story, I have some oceanfront property I would like to sell you in Arizona…for a great price, of course.

But new information has emerged to confirm “a frantic scramble erupted in the halls of the FBI to cover up this meeting. In fact, the FBI turned its sharp light not on the scandalous meeting between the attorney general and Bill Clinton–but rather on one of the whistleblowers who got the word out.”

Judicial Watch had asked the FBI, “for any records that might pertain to the infamous tarmac meeting”.

The FBI ignored them.

Judicial Watch sued for the records.

The FBI then said they couldn’t find any.

Yes, just imagine a seven-year-old in a lie, how they would handle it…that sums up the FBI’s response.

But, because of a revelation in another lawsuit, the FBI “without our knowledge–‘reopened’ our [Judicial Watch] FOIA request. The agency supposedly found about 30 pages of information, which it needed six weeks to review. The FBI finally gave them to us late Thursday.”

Now we know why the FBI played shell games. The documents show that FBI officials were concerned solely about the leaking of details of the tarmac meeting. None of the documents show top agency officials cared one whit about the propriety of the meeting itself, but only about who blew the whistle on the covert tête-à-tête.

In one email, an FBI official writes “we need to find that guy.” And in another we learn that the Phoenix FBI office was contacted “in an attempt to stem any further damage.” An FBI official working on Lynch’s security detail even goes so far as to suggest non-disclosure agreements to keep the full facts from coming forth.

No wonder the FBI didn’t turn these documents over until we caught it red-handed, hiding and lying about them.


Simply put, the FBI appears to be fully complicit in a cover-up that attempted to influence a presidential election for a favored candidate – Hillary Clinton. And the truth was trampled on a Phoenix tarmac.

Under Obama the FBI was transformed from America’s premier law enforcement agency into another corrupt appendage of the Democrat Party and has been weaponized against Republicans.

President Trump should tear the agency down, brick by brick, and rebuild it back into the apolitical law enforcement agency is was always supposed to be.

What do you think about this? Sound off and let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.