Watch Biden Say Senate Should REFUSE Bush SCOTUS Nominees Due to Election


With liberal Democrats furious at Republicans for refusing to confirm an Obama-nominated potential Supreme Court Justice, it’s important to remind them that the gloves came off long ago.

C-SPAN tweeted a “user-generated” video that reveals an interesting bit of history.

In 1992, then-Senator Joe Biden demanded that President Bush not nominate a potential Supreme Court Justice due to the impending Presidential election.

Here is a transcript of the key part of his speech:

It is my view that if a Supreme Court Justice resigns tomorrow or within the next several weeks, or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of the majority of his predecessors and not, and not name a nominee until after the November election is completed.

The senate too, Mr. President, must consider how it would respond to a Supreme Court vacancy that would occur in the full throes of an election year. It is my view that if the president goes the way of Presidents Fillmore and Johnson and presses an election year nomination, the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until ever, until after the political campaign season is over.

And I sadly predict, Mr. President, that this is going to be one of the bitterest, dirtiest presidential campaigns we will have seen in modern times.

I’m sure, Mr. President, after having uttered these words, some, some will criticize such a decision and say that it was nothing more than an attempt to save a seat on the court in hopes that a Democrat will be committed to fill it. But that would not be our intention, Mr. President, if that were the course we were to choose as a senate to not consider holding the hearings until after the election. Instead it would be our pragmatic conclusion that once the political season is underway, and it is, action on a Supreme Court nomination must be put off until after the election campaign is over. That is what is fair to the nominee and essential to the process. Otherwise, it seems to me Mr. President, we will be in deep trouble as an institution.

Take from that what you will, but remember when you find yourself in a debate over who should nominate the next Supreme Court Justice that turnabout is fair play.