AP Just Exposed Kavanaugh Accuser's Dirty Little Secret

The Associated Press just published a report titled “3rd Brett Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick has history of legal disputes,” that severely damages Swetnik’s credibility and exposes her dirty little secrets:

In a report published ahead of the interview on Monday, AP provided details about legal cases involving Swetnick, including the widely reported lawsuit against her by her former employer Webtrends, which alleged that in response to a report that she engaged in “unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct” toward two male co-workers, Swetnick claimed four co-workers sexually harassed her.

The company found no evidence for her claims and discovered that she had falsified information on her application.

The suit was eventually dropped.

Another troubling legal dispute highlighted by AP is a 1994 personal injury lawsuit Swetnick filed against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, which contains strong evidence that she attempted to swindle the department.

TRENDING: Dems Turn On President Biden, Demand To Know Why He Authorized U.S. Air Strikes In Syria

AP reports that Swetnick sued the transit authority for $420,000 in earnings she said she allegedly lost after hurting her nose in a fall on a train in 1992.

AP reports (formatting adjusted):

Swetnick, who described herself in court records as a model and actor, claimed she had “numerous modeling commitments” with several companies at the time of the accident but missed out them because of her injuries. To support her claim for lost wages, Swetnick named “Konam Studios” as one of the companies promising to employ her.

A court filing identified Nam Ko, a representative of “Kunam Studios,” as a possible plaintiff’s witness for her case.

Ko, however, told AP on Friday that he was just a friend of Swetnick’s and that he had never owned a company with a name spelled either way and had never agreed to pay her money for any work before she injured her nose. He said he first met Swetnick at a bar more than a year after her alleged accident.

“I didn’t have any money back then. I (was) broke as can be,” Ko said. Ko said he has a hazy memory of Swetnick asking to use him as a “character reference” but doesn’t recall hearing about her lawsuit. “I thought it was for a job application,” he said.

The lawsuit was dismissed in 1997 after the attorneys resolved it out of court. “Vincent Jankoski, one of the lawyers who defended the agency, said the case was resolved without paying Swetnick any money after she failed to provide documentation supporting her lost-wage claims,” AP reports.

Here’s more on Swetnik’s dirty little secrets:

Julie Swetnick, one of the women who has publicly accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, has an extensive history of involvement in legal disputes, including a lawsuit in which an ex-employer accused her of falsifying her college and work history on her job application.

Legal documents from Maryland, Oregon and Florida provide a partial picture of a woman who stepped into the media glare amid the battle over Kavanaugh’s nomination for the nation’s highest court.

Court records reviewed by The Associated Press show Swetnick has been involved in at least six legal cases over the past 25 years. Along with the lawsuit filed by a former employer in November 2000, the cases include a personal injury suit she filed in 1994 against the Washington, D.C., regional transit authority.

Her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, told the AP that court cases involving her have no bearing on the credibility of her claims about Kavanaugh. Avenatti said the suit from her ex-employer — it was dismissed a month after it was filed — was “completely bogus, which is why it was dismissed almost immediately.”

He told AP that he “fully vetted” Swetnick before helping her take her claims against Kavanaugh public.

This accuser’s case is falling apart faster than one would imagine possible.

Guess making false accusations and picking Michael Avenatti as your attorney might have been a bad move.

A man who spent seven years in a relationship with her also had a lot say about Ms. Swetnik’s credibility.

Who knew she was not credible?